Home » Giacomo Meyerbeer: LAfricaine Deuxieme Partie (22 Morceaux Et Fragments Inedits) by Robert Ignatius Letellier
Giacomo Meyerbeer: LAfricaine Deuxieme Partie (22 Morceaux Et Fragments Inedits) Robert Ignatius Letellier

Giacomo Meyerbeer: LAfricaine Deuxieme Partie (22 Morceaux Et Fragments Inedits)

Robert Ignatius Letellier

Published June 1st 2009
ISBN : 9781443806152
Paperback
250 pages
Enter the sum

 About the Book 

This volume presents the various pieces of music-from fragments, through complete pieces, to whole scenes-that were not used in the final performing edition of Meyerbeers LAfricaine. The genesis of Meyerbeers last opera is something of a legend.MoreThis volume presents the various pieces of music-from fragments, through complete pieces, to whole scenes-that were not used in the final performing edition of Meyerbeers LAfricaine. The genesis of Meyerbeers last opera is something of a legend. He had first considered the subject in 1837 when Scribe presented him with two new drafts, intended to clinch the triumphant successes of Robert le Diable (1831) and Les Huguenots (1836). The composer began composing Le Prophete immediately, but had the other project, LAfricaine, ever in his mind. By 1843 a piano score was ready, but the subject as it stood then, concerning Fernando da Sotos explorations in West Africa, did not satisfy Meyerbeer. Scribe was asked to rewrite the libretto in 1851, with the hero changed to Vasco da Gama, and focussed on his epic voyage around the Cape of Good Hope to India. A new contract was signed in 1857, and the greater part of the opera was written between 1857 and 1863, in spite of the Meyerbeers growing debility. Meyerbeer died on 2 May 1864, the day after the completion of the copying of the full score of Vasco da Gama. The rehearsal period was always a time of radical revision and excision for the composer, and he left a verbal request that the work should not be produced if he were not alive to supervise it. Minna Meyerbeer and Cesar-Victor Perrin, the director of the Opera, however, entrusted the editing of a performing edition to the famous Belgian musicologist Francois-Joseph Fetis, while the libretto was revised by Melesville. Because of the long public expectation, the editors restored the original title, and attempted to reconcile this to the Hindu elements of the action by shifting the action to the island of Madagascar. LAfricaine was produced on 28 April 1865, a glorious posthumous tribute to Scribe and Meyerbeer. Much of the music and action was suppressed, in spite of the resultant strain on the internal logic of the story. The opera caused tremendous enthusiasm, and became enormously popular, being staged 60 times in the first four seasons, and eventually receiving 485 performances in Paris until the end of the century. The Ship Scene, the exotic Indian act, and the finale under the Manchineel Tree exerted a fascination on audiences, and elicited new praise. The work began a triumphal progress through the world, beginning with the big stages of London and Berlin. In its glorious vocal writing, resplendent orchestral colouring and fragrant exoticism, it was a source of delight to many-like Franz Liszt, who produced two books of transcriptions from the work. Fetis edited a performing edition of the score, subsequently used all over the world. However, most of Meyerbeers manuscript was reproduced intact in the orchestral score printed by G. Brandus & S. Dufour. But Fetis also collected all 22 of the unused variants and fragments in vocal score for publication as the so-called Deuxieme Partie. These remain a crucial source of information for the history and future performing editions of this great opera. Fetis himself observed of his own work: . Convinced, after a first reading of the score of LAfricaine, that this opera was the masters most complete, most perfect oeuvre, the crowning achievement of his work, I then began a study of each of the parts, in order to prepare the score for the copying of the roles, the separate parts for the chorus and orchestra- and finally for the heads of the various performing departments. There began my task: sometimes several arias had been composed for the same situations, just as the composer was accustomed to do with his other operas, not fixing his choice until he had assessed the effect in rehearsals. He had also written many variants for the ensembles, particularly for the finale of act 4. Finally, indicators of performing abridgements for certain numbers of bars in many scenes were found in the manuscript for those instances where the musical development would be too long for the appropriate dramatic effect. Not wanting to prejudge the solutions that Meyerbeer had taken for many of these situations, I decided to make my choices according to my instincts, amidst all these matters left uncertain by the master. These choices were all made before I delivered the score to the copyist. During the rehearsals, the artists and the heads of services concurred that I had chosen well.